Diverse natural variants suppress mutations in hundreds of essential genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The consequence of a mutation can be influenced by the context in which it operates. For example, loss of gene function may be tolerated in one genetic background, but lead to lethality in another. The extent to which mutant phenotypes are malleable, the complexity of the architecture of modifiers, and the identities of causal genes and pathways remain largely unknown. Here, we measure the fitness effects of ~1,500 temperature sensitive alleles of yeast essential genes in the context of variation from ten different natural genetic backgrounds, and map the modifiers for 19 combinations. Altogether, fitness defects for 183 of the 530 tested genes (35%) could be suppressed by standing genetic variation in at least one wild strain. Suppression was generally driven by gain-of-function of a single, strong modifier gene. The validated causes included both variants in protein interaction partners or pathway members suppressing specific genes, as well as general modifiers altering the effect of many temperature sensitive alleles. The emerging frequency of suppression and range of possible suppression mechanisms suggest that a substantial fraction of monogenic diseases could be repressed by modulating other gene products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".