Quarterlife Crisis Pada Masa Dewasa Awal di Pekanbaru
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The transition from adolescents to adult challenges is different from the challenges of life in the previous development process. Towards the age of 25, individuals face a new life such as work, marital status, and mindset. The quarter-life crisis is a phenomenon that is common in individuals aged 20-30 years old. The crisis of a quarter of a century, that's how the term counts with individuals who attend 25 years. The quarter-life crisis experiences’ by individuals grew up. This research is descriptive quantitative research. The subjects in this study consist of 236 adults in Pekanbaru who attended for 20-30 years. The retrieval of data in this study uses the quarter-life crisis scale. The results showed that the early adult individual quarter-life crisis in Pekanbaru reached 43.22%, increasing the high category of 27.97%. The results showed the fact that factors affecting the quarterly life crisis estimated as gender, status, and occupation. The conclusions of this study show that adults in Pekanbaru who spend a quarter of life issued by women, are single and do not have jobs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it