MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110019726 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13830

"To Bring a Little Bit of the Land": Tanya Tagaq Performing at the Intersection of Decolonization and Ecocriticism

2019· dissertation· en· W3110019726 on OpenAlexaffabout
Meredith Boerchers

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecolonizationEcocriticismForegroundingGlobalismEnvironmentalismIndigenousCONTESTDeconstruction (building)SociologyEnvironmental historyEnvironmental ethicsHistoryAestheticsPolitical scienceEcologyGlobalizationArtLiteraturePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two needs that have grown increasingly critical in Canada throughout the twenty-first century are the reduction of global warming and the decolonization of lands, social institutions, and collectivities.Rather than operating independently, decolonization and environmentalism intersect as Indigenous actors contest Western assumptions about "nature" by asserting their own ecological frameworks.In this thesis, I explore Inuk vocalist Tanya Tagaq's artistic contributions to these efforts by analysing her musical commentaries on "nature" in light of Indigenous scholarship on "decolonization."I argue that Tanya Tagaq performs decolonized environmental Each instructor created welcoming learning environments in their classrooms and challenged me to explore new ways to engage music practices, and the lively discussions and comradery among my classmates greatly enriched my time at Carleton.I look forward to the future of each of their careers.Finally, I am particularly grateful for my friends and family.I truly appreciate the continual excitement, engagement, and emotional support that they provide, without which this task would have seemed all the more formidable.Their love and support are of the highest quality and value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiverse Musicological StudiesFrench-language works237,207