Chiyokoite, Ca3Si(CO3)[B(OH)4]O(OH)5·12H2O, a new ettringite-group mineral from the Fuka mine, Okayama Prefecture, Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The new ettringite-group mineral chiyokoite, ideally Ca3Si(CO3)[B(OH)4]O(OH)5·12H2O, was found in a hydrothermally altered calc-silicate skarn at the Fuka mine, Okayama Prefecture, Japan. Associated minerals are calcite, henmilite, and tacharanite. Chiyokoite occurs as hexagonal prismatic crystals up to 30 μm long and up to 20 μm thick. The major forms are the hexagonal prism {100} and monohedra {0001} and {000}. The crystals are combined in clusters which form friable nests up to 1 cm across. The mineral is pink to colorless with white streak and vitreous luster. The cleavage is parallel to {100} and {0001}, good. The fracture is stepped. Dmeas is 1.85(1) g/cm3, Dcalc is 1.85 g/cm3. Chiyokoite is optically uniaxial (–), ω = 1.523(2) and ε = 1.492(3) (589 nm). The infrared spectrum is reported. The chemical composition (wt.%) is CaO 27.56, B2O3 3.47, Al2O3 3.05, Fe2O3 0.12, As2O3 4.77, MnO2 0.32, SiO2 6.55, SO3 0.76, H2O 46.3, CO2 7.30, total 100.2. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of 3 Ca apfu is H31.37Ca3(Si0.67Al0.37Mn4+0.02Fe3+0.01)Σ1.07(C1.01B0.61As3+0.29S0.06)Σ1.97O24.19. The simplified general formula is Ca3(Si,Al)(CO3,AsO3)[B(OH)4,AsO3](OH)6·12H2O. Chiyokoite is hexagonal, P63, a = 11.0119(5), c = 10.5252(6) Å, and V = 1105.3(1) Å3. The strongest reflections of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern [d,Å(I)(hkl)] are: 9.53(100)(100), 5.50(24)(110), 4.618(11)(102), 3.812(23)(112), 3.412(15)(211), 2.726(14)(302), 2.521(19)(123), and 2.172(13)(320,402,223). The crystal structure, refined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data [R1(F) = 0.042], is based on [Ca3(Si,Al)(OH)6(H2O)12] columns parallel to the c axis with B(OH)4– and CO32– and admixed AsO33– anionic groups in channels between the columns. The mineral is named in honor of Professor Chiyoko Henmi (1949–2018).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".