MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110087713 · doi:10.18280/jesa.530512

Design and Experimental Investigations on NOx Emission Control Using FOCDM (Fractional-Order-Based Coefficient Diagram Method)-PIλDµ Controller

2020· article· en· W3110087713 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maheswari Chennippan, Balasubramaniam Meenakshipriya, Kasilingam Krishnamurthy, Varatharaj Arun Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPID controllerNOxControl theory (sociology)Hydrogen peroxideController (irrigation)DiagramCorrelation coefficientProcess controlAbsorption (acoustics)ChemistryMaterials scienceProcess (computing)MathematicsThermodynamicsComputer sciencePhysicsTemperature controlControl (management)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to explore experimental studies on the NOx removal process by using pilot plant packed column experimental hardware. Physical modeling based on chemical absorption equations is used to estimate the diameter concerning the height and L/G ratio. Hydrogen peroxide is used as the additive for achieving high NOx removal efficiency. The absorbent entering into the packed column has been controlled by varying its flow rate through the fractional order controller. The FOCDM-PIλDµ controller tuning parameters such as KP, τI, τD are determined using CDM (Coefficient Diagram Method) PID control strategy and the additional parameters of FOCDM-PIλDµ controller such as λ and µ are determined based on the PSO algorithm. The comparative analysis is performed with classical controllers like ZN-PID along with the CDM-PID controllers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicAdvanced Control Systems DesignFrench-language works237,207