MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110143632 · doi:10.5287/ora-gakpvedme

On the potential future effects of population structure on financial stability

2018· article· en· W3110143632 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mehdi El Ghorba

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsConsumption (sociology)PopulationDebtBoomConsumer debtSupply and demandSustainabilityDemographic economicsFinanceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In several advanced economies, the post World War II baby-boom was followed by a sustained drop in fertility rates to sub-replacement levels. In parallel, adult life expectancies have seen an unprecedented increase. The aim of this study is to better understand the potential future effects of these demographic dynamics on financial stability. Two major channels of influence are investigated. The first channel is through the housing market and the second is related to debt sustainability. We present a probabilistic numerical model that simulates and projects future population dynamics. This model is used to project potential future growth of two major actors of the supply and demand in the housing market; old age market leavers and first time buyers. We also use this model to project actual income and consumption trends as well as their potential quantile distributions. The models parameters are estimated and calibrated to Canada, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. We run Monte Carlo simulations and sensitivity analysis to convey uncertainty. Our results show an overall continuous and long lasting increase in old age generated supply. Potential first time buyers demand varies from country to country. However, in all countries in focus, it is increasingly sensitive to migration. Projections of actual income and consumption trends leads to decreasing support ratios. We discuss how these potential imbalances could impact the housing market, debt and to a larger extent financial stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)Same topicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207