MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110210063 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4139734

Dataset associated to Bioinspired electro-permeable glycans on carbon: Fouling control for sensing in complex matrices

2019· dataset· en· W3110210063 on OpenAlexaff
Alessandro Iannaci, Adam Myles, Éadaoin Whelan, Eoin M. Scanlan, Paula E. Colavita

Bibliographic record

VenueArrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · 2019
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersScience Foundation IrelandEuropean Commission
KeywordsFoulingCarbon fibersComplex matrixGlycanBiofoulingChemistryChemical engineeringEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceChromatographyEngineeringMembraneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset is associated to the publication "Bioinspired electro-permeable glycans on carbon: Fouling control for sensing in complex matrices" performed in Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. The dataset contains raw data associated to the measures contained in the article: X ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Atomic force microscopy, cyclic voltammetries. This publication has emanated from research conducted with the financial support of Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) grant No. 13/CDA/2213. AM and JAB gratefully acknowledge support from the School of Chemistry and the Irish Research Council Grant No. GOIPG/2014/399, respectively. EW is grateful for support by the Undergraduate Research Bursary Program of the Royal Society of Chemistry and Nuffield Foundation. Use of the XPS of Prof. I. V. Shvets and C. McGuinness provided under SFI Equipment Infrastructure funds. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 799175 (HiBriCarbon). The results of this publication reflect only the authors’ view and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207