PSII-16 Effect of red osier dogwood extract on in vitro digestibility and fermentation characteristics of high-grain diet
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Red osier dogwood (ROD) is an abundant native shrub plant in Canada and rich in phenolic compounds with antimicrobial properties. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of ROD extract supplementation on gas production (GP), DM disappearance (DMD) and fermentation characteristics in batch cultures with varying media pH. The study was a completely randomized design with 4 inclusion levels of ROD extract (0, 1, 3 and 5% of substrate) × 2 media pH (5.8 and 6.5) in a factorial arrangement. Substrate was a high-grain diet (HG) containing 10% barley silage and 90% barley-based concentrate mix (DM basis). Inoculum was obtained from 2 ruminally fistulated beef heifers offered the HG diet. Substrate (0.5 g DM) ground through a 1-mm sieve was incubated for 24 h in 3 replications including each combination of treatments. There was no interaction between media pH and inclusion level of ROD on GP, DMD and fermentation variables. Increased media pH (5.8 vs 6.5) increased (P < 0.01) GP (averaged 198 vs. 389 ml/g substrate), DMD (averaged 51.3 vs. 64.6%), and total volatile fatty acid production (averaged 74 vs. 83 mM). Increasing addition of ROD extract did not affect GP, but linearly (P < 0.05) decreased DMD from 56 to 46% at pH 5.8 and from 69 to 61% at pH 6.5. Increasing ROD extract linearly (P < 0.01) increased the proportion of acetate from 43 to 47% and 47 to 50% at pH 5.8 and 6.5, respectively. Acetate to propionate ratio increased from 1.68 to 1.93 and from 1.90 to 2.10 at pH 5.8 and 6.5, respectively. These results indicated that the decreased DMD along with increased acetate to propionate ratio with addition of ROD extract suggests ROD extract may be beneficial to HG fed cattle for reducing risk of rumen acidosis without negatively impacting fibre digestion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it