MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110324194 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100176

Accurate Silent Synapse Estimation from Simulator-Corrected Electrophysiological Data Using the SilentMLE Python Package

2020· article· en· W3110324194 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Lynn, Richard Naud, Jean-Claude Béı̈que

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersKrembil FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Brain CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPython (programming language)EstimatorComputer scienceSynapseArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceNeuroscienceStatisticsProgramming languageMathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proportion of silent (AMPAR-lacking) synapses is thought to be related to the plasticity potential of neural networks. We created a maximum-likelihood estimator of silent synapse fraction based on simulations of the underlying experimental methodology. Here, we provide a set of guidelines for running a Python package on compatible experimental synaptic data. Compared with traditional failure-rate approaches, this synthetic likelihood estimator improves the validity and accuracy of the estimates of the silent synapse fraction. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Lynn et al. (2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.282
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207