MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Inferring the surface roughness of Al-Si coated 22MnB5 steel using an in situ laser speckle characterization technique

2020· article· en· W3110334199 on OpenAlexaff
C.M. Klassen, Johannes Emmert, Kyle J. Daun

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceIntermetallicHot stampingMetallurgyAluminiumSurface roughnessCoatingSpeckle patternSurface finishWeldabilityComposite materialSiliconLaserProfilometerWeldingOpticsAlloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hot stamping of aluminium-silicon (Al-Si) coated 22MnB5 steel blanks is widely used in the automotive industry to produce light yet crashworthy parts. However, the coating melts at ∼577°C and transforms into a rough intermetallic layer as iron from the base steel diffuses towards the surface. The blank surface roughness impacts the radiative properties during heating as well as weldability, paint adhesiveness, and cooling rate during forming and quenching. This study pioneers the use of laser speckle patterns, caused by the constructive and destructive interference of collimated light reflected off the blanks, to infer the evolving surface roughness of Al-Si coated steel coupons in situ. The results reveal a significant increase in surface roughness once intermetallic compounds reach the surface and that higher furnace set-points produce rougher parts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicSurface Roughness and Optical MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207