MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ANALISIS PERANAN SEKTOR PERTANIAN DAN PENGEMBANGANNYA DI KABUPATEN BURU

2019· article· en· W3110341586 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Cita Ekonomika · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLivestock Farming and Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWOT analysisAgricultureEconomic base analysisAgricultural scienceLivestockBusinessEconomic sectorGeographyAgricultural economicsForestryEconomicsEconomyMarketingEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The agricultural sector as one of the economic sectors is a very potential sector in contributing to regional economic development. This research was conducted to determine the contribution of agricultural secrtor to GDRP, the position of the food crop, horticulture, plantation, and livestock sub sector and its development strategy in Buru Regency. The study used contribution analysis method, analysis of Location Quotient (LQ), Dynamic Location Quotient (DLQ) and SWOT analysis. The results of the study showed that the agricultural sector contributed greatly to Buru Regency GDRP with its four sub sectors being the base sub-sector and the basis for the future was livestock sub-sector. The strategy undertaken in developing the four agricultural sub sectors was an agressive strategy that uses power to utilize existing opportunities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it