MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multimodality Weight and Score Fusion for SLAM

2020· article· en· W3110341679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrajectorySimultaneous localization and mappingArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkFeature (linguistics)FusionDeep learningComputer visionRobotLayer (electronics)Sensor fusionPattern recognition (psychology)Mobile robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM) is used to predict the trajectory by the Autonomous Navigation Robots (ANR), for instance Self-Driving Cars (SDC). It computes the trajectory through sensing the surroundings, like a visual perception of the environment. This work focuses on the performance improvements of a SLAM model using multimodal learning: (i), early fusion via layer weight enhancement of feature extractors, and (ii), late fusion via score refinement of the trajectory (pose) regressor. The comparative analysis on Apolloscape dataset shows that the proposed fusion strategies improve localization performance significantly. This work also evaluates applicability of various Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) for SLAM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207