Co-construcción de saberes, innovación social y desarrollo territorial: una experiencia quebequense [Knowledge co-construction, social innovation and territorial development: a Québec experience]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El movimiento de la economia social en Quebec cuenta con una trayectoria de concertacion que lo dispone al desarrollo de dinamicas de co-construccion y transferencia de saberes. Frente a la aplicacion de politicas de austeridad y al desmantelamiento de las corporaciones de desarrollo economico distintas practicas locales plantean el dialogo entre investigacion y accion sobre el terreno como una clave para la movilizacion ciudadana y la articulacion de procesos de innovacion social. En el cruce entre los saberes de dichas practicas y un nuevo paradigma epistemologico se encuentra la organizacion Territoires innovants en Economie Sociale et Solidaire (TIESS). El presente articulo analiza dicha iniciativa explorando sus referentes inmediatos y tomando en cuenta los condicionantes que inciden en la transferencia de saberes sobre innovacion social. Como conclusion se observa que la organizacion del vinculo entre actores socialmente innovadores es en la actualidad uno de los principales retos del desarrollo territorial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".