Celnica na granicy imperium – Muzeum św. Brata Alberta w Igołomi / Customs house on the border of the empire. The Museum of St. Brother Albert in Igołomia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1815, Igołomia became a border village. The authorities of the Kingdom of Poland, and then the tsarist administration maintained a customs house in the village. Its role was to facilitate the trade of goods from the territory of the Kraków Republic and the Austrian partition to the Russian partition. In 1844–1846 Wojciech Chmielowski, father of Adam, the future Saint Brother Albert, was the head of the 1st-class customs house in Igołomia. Adam was born here on August 20, 1845. His short time in Igołomia did not affect his fate, but the historical place of his birth was commemorated. When the Albertine Sisters began their service in Igołomia in 1986, this memory was strengthened. In 1994–1995 a new religious house and the Museum of St. Brother Albert were founded. The museum was located in the historic customs building, although the building itself was not the home where the Saint was born. This building was subjected to demolition after the mid-19th century. In its place after 1857, a new customs house was built, which survived until recently, when it was demolished in 2010 and a new museum building was erected in its place. The museum refers to the place of birth of Saint Brother Albert, and part of the exhibition displays the tradition of the customs house.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".