Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the problem of community detection in bipartite networks that are characterized by the presence of two types of nodes such that connections exist only between nodes of different types. While some approaches have been proposed to identify community structures in bipartite networks, there are a number of problems still to solve. In fact, the majority of the proposed approaches suffer from one or even more of the following limitations: (1) difficulty in detecting communities in the presence of many non-discriminating nodes with atypical connections that hide the community structures, (2) loss of relevant topological information due to the transformation of the bipartite network to standard plain graphs, and (3) manually specifying several input parameters, including the number of communities to be identified. To alleviate these problems, we propose BiNeTClus, a parameter-free community detection algorithm in bipartite networks that operates in two phases. The first phase focuses on identifying an initial grouping of nodes through a transactional data model capable of dealing with the situation that involves networks with many atypical connections, that is, sparsely connected nodes and nodes of one type that massively connect to all other nodes of the second type. The second phase aims to refine the clustering results of the first phase via an optimization strategy of the bipartite modularity to identify the final community structures. Our experiments on both synthetic and real networks illustrate the suitability of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it