Explanatory Model of the Parent-Child Attachment Relationship in Autism: The Influence of Siblings and Parental Stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first bond formed between a child and his parent, generally his main attachment figure, remains essential for the development of the child’s autonomy. While around 1% of the world’s population is diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD; Fédération québécoise de l’autisme, 2019), some factors are said to negatively influence the development of the attachment between children with ASD and their parents, explaining why they seem more likely to develop an insecure attachment style (Oppenheim et al., 2012). An explanatory model has been proposed by Lapointe (2017), which suggests that certain factors, such as social communication deficits, associated disorders, and parental stress, could have a moderating effect on the relation between the quality of the attachment and the autistic symptoms. The following article proposes an enhancement of this theoretical model by considering a possible bidirectional link between siblings and parental stress. Keywords: parent-child attachment, insecure attachment style, autism spectrum disorder, parental stress in autism spectrum disorder, siblings of autistic children
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".