O extrativismo agrário do Governo Bolsonaro a partir das relações Estado-Sociedade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A relação entre políticas sociais e governos progressistas na América Latina caracteriza o neoextrativismo. Com o golpe de 2016, uma só agricultura passa a ter espaço no Estado brasileiro – o monocultivo de larga escala para exportação. O agricultor camponês e familiar deixa de fazer parte do processo de construção de políticas públicas e, igualmente, não é mais atendido por elas. O extrativismo dos governos de direita demanda uma nova agenda de pesquisa. Como construir sentido da violência, do ódio aos povos do campo e apoio irrestrito ao agronegócio no governo Bolsonaro? A análise das relações Estado-sociedade evidência quais atores e interesses são beneficiados e quais são ‘deixados de fora’ ao restringir a participação política. Bolsonaro consolida um extrativismo sem limite: um ‘extrativismo total’ que ataca movimentos sociais do campo, extingue espaços institucionais, paralisa a reforma agrária e impossibilita a soberania alimentar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".