MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110743749 · doi:10.31963/sinergi.v18i2.2627

Studi Estimasi Beban Puncak Hari Libur Nasional Sistem Interkoneksi Sulselbar Menggunakan Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan Propagasi Balik

2020· article· en· W3110743749 on OpenAlexaff
Makmur Saini, A. M. Shiddiq Yunus, Firdaus Firdaus

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Teknik Mesin Sinergi · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityPower networkBackpropagationMains electricityPopulationComputer sciencePower (physics)Electric power systemArtificial neural networkReliability engineeringEnvironmental economicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceEconomicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of population from time to time is increased and the need for electricity consumption is also increased. Simultaneously increasing the need for electric power requires the provider of electricity supply in this case PT. PLN (Persero) should deliver power effectively to consumers. To maximize the distribution of electricity to the consumer, a load planning is required. This load planning is conducted to find out how much amount of power is required by consumer. The purpose of this research is to investigate the need of power load of interconnection system of South Sulawesi and to investigate the accuracy of load planning using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) backpropagation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Teknik Mesin SinergiSame topicData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207