MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110761191 · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.062701

General liquid-crystal theory for anisotropically shaped molecules: Symmetry, orientational order parameters, and system free energy

2020· article· en· W3110761191 on OpenAlexafffund
Jie Xu, Jeff Z. Y. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHomogeneous spaceSymmetry (geometry)MoleculePhysicsLiquid crystalOrder (exchange)Molecular symmetryGroup (periodic table)Symmetry groupGroup theoryTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsCondensed matter physicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A general theory of liquid crystals is presented, starting from the group-theory symmetry analysis of the constituting molecules. A particular attention is paid to the type of elastic free-energies and their relationships with the molecular symmetries. The orientational order-parameter tensors are identified for each molecular symmetry, in a consideration of consistently keeping the leading, characteristic elastic free energies in a model. The order parameters are expressed in terms of symmetric traceless tensors, some of high orders, for all major molecular symmetries, including seven groups of axial symmetries and seven groups of polyhedral symmetries. For spatially inhomogeneous liquid crystals, the couplings of these tensors in the elastic energies are derived by expanding the interaction energies between these molecules. The aim is to provide a general view of the molecular symmetries of individual molecules, orientational order parameters characterizing the orientational distribution functions, and the elastic free energies, all under one single group-theory approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207