MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110761191 · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.062701

General liquid-crystal theory for anisotropically shaped molecules: Symmetry, orientational order parameters, and system free energy

2020· article· en· W3110761191 on OpenAlexafffund
Jie Xu, Jeff Z. Y. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHomogeneous spaceSymmetry (geometry)MoleculePhysicsLiquid crystalOrder (exchange)Molecular symmetryGroup (periodic table)Symmetry groupGroup theoryTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsCondensed matter physicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A general theory of liquid crystals is presented, starting from the group-theory symmetry analysis of the constituting molecules. A particular attention is paid to the type of elastic free-energies and their relationships with the molecular symmetries. The orientational order-parameter tensors are identified for each molecular symmetry, in a consideration of consistently keeping the leading, characteristic elastic free energies in a model. The order parameters are expressed in terms of symmetric traceless tensors, some of high orders, for all major molecular symmetries, including seven groups of axial symmetries and seven groups of polyhedral symmetries. For spatially inhomogeneous liquid crystals, the couplings of these tensors in the elastic energies are derived by expanding the interaction energies between these molecules. The aim is to provide a general view of the molecular symmetries of individual molecules, orientational order parameters characterizing the orientational distribution functions, and the elastic free energies, all under one single group-theory approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207