MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110796937 · doi:10.4000/danse.3367

Entre désordres et gaieté populaire, les bals publics aux Champs-Élysées (1770-1825)

2020· article· fr· W3110796937 on OpenAlex
Véronique Laporte

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches en danse · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublicsArtHumanitiesGeographyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au XVIIIe siècle, les Champs-Élysées se trouvent à la périphérie de la ville de Paris. Le directeur des Bâtiments du roi, désirant à tout prix conserver le caractère champêtre de cet espace vert, tente d’y interdire les divertissements pouvant troubler la quiétude des lieux. Sa méfiance à l’égard des cabarets offrant des bals publics, susceptibles d’attirer la populace, est particulièrement forte. Néanmoins, le lieutenant général de police, ne partageant pas les craintes du directeur, permet à certains bals publics de s’établir dans les environs des Champs-Élysées. Ainsi, les autorités de l’Ancien régime, tout comme les gestionnaires qui seront en poste au tournant du XIXe siècle, ont adopté des attitudes parfois très nuancées par rapport aux bals publics. Ces derniers ont ainsi pu perdurer et devenir l’une des principales attractions des Champs-Élysées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it