MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110801865 · doi:10.1097/pgp.0000000000000721

A Rare Case of Castleman Disease Presenting as an Ovarian Tumor

2020· article· en· W3110801865 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio D’Antonio, Alessia Caleo, Maria Addesso, Alessandro Caputo, Filippo Fraggetta, Maurilio Ponzoni

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDifferential diagnosisRare diseaseOvaryMediastinumHyalineCastleman diseaseOvarian tumorPathologyEtiologyRadiologyDiseaseOvarian cancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Castleman disease (CD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder of unknown etiology. Its most common location is the mediastinum, but many other sites have been reported. We report a case of primary CD of the ovary, a rare localization with only 2 cases including the present case described in the world literature to date. A 58-yr-old woman who initially presented with abdominal pain underwent computed tomography scan which showed bilateral well-circumscribed solid adnexal masses. Because an ovarian bilateral tumor was suspected the patient was treated with a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and the histopathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of CD hyaline-vascular type of the right ovary associated with a contralateral fibroma. Three years after surgery the patient is alive and well and shows no signs of recurrent disease. The occurrence of this rare presentation of CD is the subject of this report. The problems of differential diagnosis with the most frequent lesions of the female pelvis are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecological PathologySame topicViral-associated cancers and disordersFrench-language works237,207