Evaluation of the effectiveness of educational technology in the prevention of falls in the surgical medical clinic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a flipchart as an educational technology for patient education on preventing falls in hospitalized patients.Methods: This is a quasi-experimental study, being a pilot study type, with a quantitative approach, carried out in a hospital in the northern region of the State of Ceará, Brazil. Thirty-one patients represented the sample from August to November 2019. For the collection of information, it has been applied a structured instrument that includes two parts: a) Clinical-epidemiological data; b) Fall prevention knowledge test.Results: In the pre-test, there was a median of correct answers of 17 (interquartile range = 8), while in the post-test the median of correct answers was 20 (interquartile range = 6). Significance was observed in the increase in average of theoretical correct answers (p < .000).Conclusions: The flipchart is an effective technology to be used in health education to prevent falls, favoring an increased perception of risks in the hospital environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.032 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it