CAREA: Cotraining Attribute and Relation Embeddings for Cross-Lingual Entity Alignment in Knowledge Graphs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge graphs (KGs) are one of the most widely used techniques of knowledge organizations and have been extensively used in many application fields related to artificial intelligence, for example, web search and recommendations. Entity alignment provides a useful tool for how to integrate multilingual KGs automatically. However, most of the existing studies evaluated ignore the abundant information of entity attributes except for entity relationships. This paper sets out to investigate cross-lingual entity alignment and proposes an iterative cotraining approach (CAREA) to train a pair of independent models. The two models can extract the attribute and the relation features of multilingual KGs, respectively. In each iteration, the two models alternate to predict a new set of potentially aligned entity pairs. Besides, this method further filters through the dynamic threshold value to enhance the two models’ supervision. Experimental results on three real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method. The CAREA model improves the performance with at least an absolute increase of 3.9 <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"><mo>%</mo></math> across all experiment datasets. The code is available at https://github.com/ChenBaiyang/CAREA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it