MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110889869 · doi:10.32920/cd.v3i1.648

A Reflection on Cultural Competence: A Dietitian's Didactic Discourse

2016· article· en· W3110889869 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Rosie Dhaliwal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Critical Dietetics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Competency in Health Care
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultural competenceCompetence (human resources)PedagogyPsychologyMedical educationSociologyNursingEngineering ethicsMedicineSocial psychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper makes the case that cultural competence is a key part of dietetic practice and in turn dietetic education. With a breadth of studies on cultural competence in dietetics and health care, the human, relational component hasn’t been emphasized. To this end, this paper makes the case for a holistic view of clients, patients and all of those who fall under the care and guidance of dietitians. And further, for practitioners to work with a notion of self-reflection to develop a disposition that is attuned to culture. Pedagogical implications and curricular applications are included as a result of this inquiry while concepts from Sikhism are offered as illustrative components to highlight this reflection on cultural competence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Critical DieteticsSame topicCultural Competency in Health CareFrench-language works237,207