MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bashkirs of the Tashkent oasis in the second half of the XIX – the first quarter of the XX century: historical and cultural portrait

2020· article· en· W3110899060 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Timur Ayupov

Bibliographic record

VenueOOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Innovation and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)State (computer science)HistoryIdeologyGenealogyPopulationMultinational corporationGeographyEthnic groupPrismAncient historyCartographyDemographyArt historySociologyPolitical scienceArtArchaeologyPoliticsAnthropologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the formation history and main characteristics of the ethnic group of the Bashkirs in the territory of Tashkent and its environs in the period before the start of the national-state demarcation in Central Asia. This complex process is examined through the prism of a number of historical events. The presence of the Bashkirs among the multinational population of Tashkent is confirmed in various sources, including the censuses of 1897 and 1926. The names of many famous personalities from among the Bashkirs, whose activities took place here, are revealed. The conclusion is substantiated that the Bashkirs in Turkestan played an important role as mediators in the implementation of new ideological principles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOOO Zhurnal Voprosy IstoriiSame topicEducation, Innovation and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207