The Performance of Slag Containing Engineered Cementitious Composites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC) is a type of fibre reinforced cement-based composite that is used in different construction applications. The use of fly ash in these composites improves tensile strain capacity, multiple cracking behaviour, and durability. However, fly ash is in short supply as many countries are in an effort to phase-out fossil fuels, and are eliminating coal plants. An alternative to fly ash is slag. In contrast to fly ash, the supply of slag is expected to be sustained. Hence, many industries have considered substituting fly ash with slag in the production of ECC. This study was designed to determine the mechanical, and permeability of ECC mixtures containing fly ash and slag. The study contained a total of four mixtures. Two of the mixtures had the ratio of supplementary cementitious materials to cement of 2.2 and two more mixtures had supplementary cementitious materials to cement ratio of 1.2. The water to binder ratio was the same for all mixtures. Test results showed that slag blends improved the mechanical and permeability characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it