MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110929345 · doi:10.1522/revueot.v29n3.1192

NousRire : étude de cas d’une entreprise québécoise repensant la marque responsable traditionnelle

2020· article· fr· W3110929345 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Audrey L. Girard, Jonathan Deschênes

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Organisations & territoires · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsHEC MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fondée en 2015, NousRire est une petite entreprise à but lucratif québécoise qui a pour mission de « rendre accessibles des aliments biologiques non périssables d’excellente qualité, tout en permettant de faire des économies et en créant un impact positif sur la Terre et sur ses habitants »1. L’entreprise offre aux clients de passer leurs commandes en ligne et de venir les récupérer dans des lieux de cueillette précis durant des périodes appelées « journées d’emballage ». Ces aliments sont disponibles en vrac pour minimiser la production de déchets. Plus de 500 bénévoles oeuvrent durant ces périodes afin de distribuer la nourriture dans les contenants des clients, qui emballent eux-mêmes leur commande. NousRire est constituée de 18 « cellules » autogérées ancrées dans diverses régions du Québec, dont l’Estrie, l’Abitibi, les Laurentides et la région de Montréal. L’entreprise fonctionne grâce à l’implication de 2000 bénévoles et d’environ 20 employés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Organisations & territoiresSame topicFood Waste Reduction and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207