MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110943900 · doi:10.1139/cjz-2020-0020

<i>Alpheus richpalmeri</i>, a new species of snapping shrimp from the tropical eastern Atlantic (Malacostraca: Decapoda: Alpheidae)

2020· article· en· W3110943900 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Arthur Anker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyDecapodaShrimpTropical AtlanticEcologyZoologyCrustaceanOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new snapping shrimp, Alpheus richpalmeri sp. nov., is described based on three specimens collected in the muddy–rocky intertidal of São Tomé Island, Gulf of Guinea, tropical eastern Atlantic. The new species belongs to the Alpheus brevirostris (Olivier, 1811) species group, sharing a series of morphological features and a similar colour pattern with two Atlantic species of the group, e.g., Alpheus roblesi Bracken-Grissom and Felder, 2014 and Alpheus ulalae Bracken-Grissom and Felder, 2014, as well as with the Indo-West Pacific Alpheus platyunguiculatus (Banner, 1953). The new species may have been previously reported from the tropical eastern Atlantic by A. Crosnier and J. Forest (1966. Ann. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco, 44: 199–314) under the name Alpheus floridanus floridanus Kingsley, 1878, which is clearly different from the lectotype of Alpheus floridanus Kingsley, 1878 upon which H.D. Bracken-Grissom and D.L. Felder (2014. Zootaxa, 3895(4): 451–491) based their redescription of this species. The form previously known as Alpheus floridanus var. africana Balss, 1916, or Alpheus floridanus africanus, is elevated to full species rank as Alpheus africanus stat. nov., based on morphological differences and geographical separation from A. floridanus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207