MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3110944045 · doi:10.1093/geroni/igaa057.950

A Conceptual Framework of Person-Environment Relations in the Out-of-Home Mobility of People Living With Dementia

2020· article· en· W3110944045 on OpenAlexaff
Kishore Seetharaman, Habib Chaudhury, Atiya Mahmood

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation in Aging · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomyDementiaPsychologyAgency (philosophy)Conceptual frameworkNeighbourhood (mathematics)PsychosocialPlace attachmentSocial psychologyGerontologySociologyMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper proposes a conceptual framework on the relationship between neighbourhood mobility and developmental outcomes of persons living with dementia. While there is growing evidence on the importance of out-of-home mobility for community-dwelling people with dementia, there is a lack of theoretical understanding of the person-environment (P-E) interactions involved in out-of-home mobility in the context of dementia and their influence on psychosocial outcomes. The proposed framework adapts Chaudhury and Oswald’s Integrative Conceptual Framework of Person-Environment Exchange to address the influence of out-of-home mobility-related P-E interactions on processes of agency and belonging for people living with dementia and the cumulative effect on developmental outcomes of autonomy and identity. The framework describes a linear sequence of four components: (i) out-of-home mobility-related P-E interactions determined by individual, social, physical environmental, and technological factors; (ii) mobility-related environmental barriers and facilitators and perception of out-of-home mobility-related risk and benefit; (iii) interrelated positive and negative processes of behaviour-driven agency and experience-driven belonging; and (iv) interrelated developmental outcomes of autonomy and identity. This framework advances our conceptual understanding of the relations between the experience of living with dementia and different aspects of the neighbourhood environment by bridging objective and subjective dimensions of P-E interactions and framing out-of-home mobility as an important contributor in maintaining identity and autonomy. The framework could inform empirical research in this area, evaluation of dementia-friendly community initiatives, and policy decisions by drawing attention to both the functional aspects and meanings associated with out-of-home mobility for persons living with dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovation in Aging→Same topicUrban Transport and Accessibility→French-language works237,207→