Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the quadratic assignment problem with a rank-one cost matrix (QAP-R1). Four integer-programming formulations are introduced of which three are assumed to have partial integer data. Unlike the standard quadratic assignment problem, some of our formulations can solve reasonably large instances of QAP-R1 with impressive running times and are faster than some metaheuristics. Pairwise relative strength of the LP relaxations of these formulations are also analyzed from theoretical and experimental points of view. Finally, we present a new metaheuristic algorithm to solve QAP-R1 along with its computational analysis. Our study offers the first systematic experimental analysis of integer-programming models and heuristics for QAP-R1. The benchmark instances with various characteristics generated for our study are made available to the public for future research work. Some new polynomially solvable special cases are also introduced. Summary of Contribution: This paper aims to advance our knowledge and ability in solving an important special case of the quadratic assignment problem. It shows how to exploit inherent properties of an optimization problem to achieve computational advantages, a strategy that was followed by researchers in model building and algorithm developments for decades. Our computational results attest to this time-tested general philosophy. The paper presents the first systematic computational study of the rank one quadratic assignment problem, along with new mathematical programming models and complexity analysis. We believe the theoretical and computational results of this paper will inspire further research on the topic and will be of significant value to practitioners using rank one quadratic assignment models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it