MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111027253 · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283427

Instance Segmentation of Personal Protective Equipment using a Multi-stage Transfer Learning Process

2020· article· en· W3111027253 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas Truong, Aakash Bhatt, Leonardo Queiroz, Kenneth Lai, Svetlana Yanushkevich

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPersonal protective equipmentComputer scienceSegmentationVisibilityProcess (computing)Transfer of learningArtificial intelligenceHazardous wasteHuman–computer interactionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the instance segmentation of soft attributes on humans such as clothing and personal protective equipment at a hazardous workplace. We propose the use of soft biometric object classes from the Open Images V5 and DeepFashion2 datasets to pre-train a mask segmentation network to detect and segment personal protective equipment in the workplace. Preliminary results of our proposed model achieves a mean average precision, mAP50, of 61.7% with minimal optimization, resulting in very good segmentation of construction helmets, high visibility vests, welding masks, and ear protection in the workplace. Applications of the results from this paper include improving workplace safety in hazardous industries by providing a tool to ensure proper personal protective equipment usage while maintaining worker anonymity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207