MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111028250 · doi:10.3138/cjfs-2019-0006

Shanghaied in Singapore: Dogmas of Orientalism

2020· article· fr· W3111028250 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Philippe Mather

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocioeconomic Development in Asia
Canadian institutionsCampion CollegeUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesOrientalismArtPhilosophyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur propose un examen approfondi d ’Orientalism ( L’Orientalisme) d’Edward Saïd (1978), afin de réfuter la critique classique selon laquelle l’analyse de Saïd serait entachée de ce même défaut de binarité essentialiste qu’il relève dans le discours orientaliste. L’œuvre de Saïd serait, en effet, plus nuancée que ce que l’on tient souvent pour acquis, tout en demeurant un paradigme assez clair qui permet l’étude multidimensionnelle des textes filmiques : 1) repérage de schémas dans les représentations orientales ; 2) évaluation du degré de conformité aux stéréotypes orientalistes ; et 3) tracé de l’évolution du discours orientaliste dans les films, compte tenu à la fois les thèmes persistants et des nouvelles variantes telles que le techno-orientalisme. Les films de fiction narratifs qui se déroulent à Singapour servent d’étude de cas, notamment le film de Bette Davis The Letter ( La Lettre) (1940).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicSocioeconomic Development in AsiaFrench-language works237,207