MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3111051924 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v5i5.1593

Time-Varying Vulnerability to Non-Fatal Overdose: A Self-Controlled Case Series

2020· article· en· W3111051924 on OpenAlexaffabout
Claire Keen, Kathryn Snow, Chloé G. Xavier, Jesse T Young, Stuart A. Kinner, Amanda Slaunwhite

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease Control
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentRate ratioPoisson regressionEmergency medicineIncidence (geometry)Confidence intervalDrug overdoseRelative riskConfoundingPoison controlMedical prescriptionInternal medicinePsychiatryPopulationEnvironmental healthPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionCohort studies have suggested that there are periods of time, including the two weeks following release from prison and the transition on and off opioid agonist therapy (OAT), where the risk of overdose is heightened. However, this research has focused on fatal overdose and may be subject to confounding. Objectives and ApproachThis study aimed to examine the association between time-varying risk factors – release from incarceration, discharge from hospital and emergency department, and use of prescribed OAT, opioids, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics – and non-fatal overdose. People in a 20% random sample of residents in BC, Canada who experienced a non-fatal overdose in 2015-2017 were identified through hospital admissions, physician and emergency department visits, and poison centre and ambulance calls. Risk periods associated with exposure to each time varying risk factor were created using linked administrative data. Using a self-controlled case series design, conditional Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio of non-fatal overdose during the risk periods compared to at other times. Results4149 people experienced a non-fatal overdose during follow-up. People were at increased risk of overdose on the day of admission to prison (adjusted incidence rate ratio (AIRR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.5-5.0), in the two weeks after release from prison (AIRR 2.9, 95%CI 2.4-3.6) and after hospital discharge (AIRR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1-1.6), and during prescription opioid (AIRR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0-1.6) and benzodiazepine (AIRR 1.7, 95%CI 1.3-2.1) use. People were at lower risk of non-fatal overdose during OAT use (AIRR 0.4, 95%CI 0.3-0.5) and while in prison (AIRR 0.1, 95%CI 0.1-0.2). Conclusion / ImplicationsThere are acute, transient periods where a person’s risk of overdose is heightened. These include release from incarceration, discharge from hospital, and while taking prescription opioids and benzodiazepines. These periods of increased risk should be targeted for overdose prevention efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data Science→Same topicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment→French-language works237,207→