MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111063826 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnaa310

Monopole Floer Homology, Eigenform Multiplicities, and the Seifert–Weber Dodecahedral Space

2020· article· en· W3111063826 on OpenAlexaff
Francesco Lin, Michael Lipnowski

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFloer homologyMathematicsMultiplicity (mathematics)Homology (biology)DodecahedronEigenvalues and eigenvectorsPure mathematicsMagnetic monopoleHomogeneous spaceMathematical analysisGeometryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We show that the Seifert–Weber dodecahedral space $\textsf{SW}$ is a monopole Floer homology $L$-space. The proof relies on our approach to study Floer homology using hyperbolic geometry. Although $\textsf{SW}$ is significantly larger than previous manifolds studied with this technique, we overcome computational complexity issues inherent to our method by exploiting the many symmetries of $\textsf{SW}$. In particular, we prove that small eigenvalues on coexact $1$-forms on $\textsf{SW}$ have large multiplicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207