MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111090830 · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-11892

Complex NMF for Multichannel Source Separation

2017· dissertation· en· W3111090830 on OpenAlexaff
Tung Nguyen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNon-negative matrix factorizationBlind signal separationSource separationComputer scienceMatrix decompositionCluster analysisShort-time Fourier transformChannel (broadcasting)Speech recognitionAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsFourier transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, a new tool known as Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF) has presented itself as a formidable and useful tool for providing a parts based representation of matrix data. It has been applied with success in audio signal processing for topics such as blind source separation (BSS), music transcription and for representing musical and/or speech mixtures as additively occurring nonnegative representations of audio components. In the STFT domain, this is due to the fact that Fourier coefficients can be stored and processed as either matrices or tensors, and the additive mixtures of sounds can be further parametrized and factorized in some way to output a parts based time-frequency representation of the sound mixtures. In this thesis, we consider both speech mixtures and musical mixtures, as valid types of mixtures to be separated by the proposed algorithm. This thesis presents research and a proposed algorithm that addresses the problem of underdetermined multichannel frequency domain BSS, and investigates spatial covariance matrix (SCM) based NMF and single channel CNMF algorithms as applied to complex (as opposed to nonnegative) STFT coefficients. The research also investigates K-means clustering applied to interchannel frequency dependent phase differences in order to achieve source separation using SCM NMF based techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207