MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111145856 · doi:10.1145/3444831.3444841

Advice from SIGMOD/PODS 2020

2020· article· en· W3111145856 on OpenAlexaff
David Maier, Rachel Pottinger, AnHai Doan, Eduard Dragut, Bill Howe, Joanne Lateulere, John Lateulere, Mostafa Milani, Tilmann Rabl, Dan Suciu, Yufei Tao, Wang-Chiew Tan, Kristin Tufte

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGMOD Record · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConferences and Exhibitions Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticeComputer scienceAdvice (programming)Component (thermodynamics)World Wide WebPolitical scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This document collects the experiences and advice from the organizers of the SIGMOD/PODS 2020, which shifted on short notice to an online-only conference. It is mainly intended for others who are organizing online conferences, but some of it may be of use in the future to people organizing ?live? conferences with an online component.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0120.010
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2100.287

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGMOD RecordSame topicConferences and Exhibitions ManagementFrench-language works237,207