MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111158854 · doi:10.1111/jonm.13223

LGBTQ+ Special Edition—Journal of Nursing Management

2020· article· en· W3111158854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edward McCann, Gráinne Donohue

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursing managementNursingMedicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globally, there is an imperative in providing access to appropriate and responsive health care for all citizens (World Health Organization, 2016). There is an increased interest in how these concerns extend to wider populations such those people identifying as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer or Questioning (LGBTQ+) (Government Equalities Office, 2018). However, there remain significant gaps in the research evidence around the distinct supports and services available to meet the specific needs of LGBTQ+ populations. This is evident in the shortcomings that exist in the education and practice development requirements of nurses and other allied health professionals (McCann & Brown, 2020). International responses to discrimination and social exclusion are becoming more evident in health inequality and human rights legislative documents in order to address concerns that can impact significantly upon the lives of LGBTQ+ people (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2014; Royal College of Nursing, 2016). For some LGBTQ+ people, issues related to minority stress can result in depression, anxiety, suicidality, loneliness and isolation (Institute of Medicine, 2011). The impact of adverse societal reactions can lead to further negative consequences for physical and mental health. For this reason, it is necessary to have responsive health care and supports for LGBTQ+ people including access and a range of interventions to address specific issues and concerns (Stonewall, 2018). It is important that statutory organisations and professional bodies have LGBTQ+ issues and concerns at the heart of physical and mental health services. Health care providers need to implement strategies to reduce inequalities and improve access to appropriate health care services. In order to successfully operationalize such processes, there is a need for competent and confident nurse leaders and managers to work across health care systems to ensure that the needs and concerns of LGBTQ+ people are recognized and fulfilled. Many of the articles included in this special issue make recommendations for nurse managers on how to initiate and sustain change in addressing the health care needs of LGBTQ+ people. The many gaps in specialized care are highlighted by researchers from Ireland, Spain, Slovenia, Turkey, Canada, the UK, Israel and the USA, adding to this growing body of knowledge. Many of the studies included were carried out in acute settings, provide a culturally diverse perspective and highlight the critical role that nurse managers have in supporting the development of a competent and inclusively minded workforce. The articles unanimously demonstrate that supporting nurses to develop capacity and confidence can improve access to care for this population. In several studies, the issue of stigmatizing and discriminatory attitudes among health care providers is addressed. Researchers have offered strategies on how to initiate positive change. In one paper examining family medicine practices in Philadelphia in the United States, six essential components were identified for nurse managers to deliver high-quality care. This includes organisational buy-in, customer service and engagement, physical environment, forms and data collection, staff training and health system policies. Support for health care providers in practice, education and research has been prioritized throughout several of these studies. One paper advocates for mentorship and collaboration to aid competency development for individuals who present to primary care. Ensuring the workplace provided gender-affirming care was identified as key to a safe and inclusive environment. In another study of 124 nursing students, findings suggest that the integration of LGBTQ+ content into nursing curricula could be a useful and supportive initiative at undergraduate level. A smaller group of studies focus on interventions or strategies to target specific health concerns of this population. There is a call to study, for example, the specific health concerns of sexual and gender minority populations, such as men who have sex with men and act on their support needs. Another commentary uses a conceptual framework of access to care, illustrating issues LGBT+ older adults may face in accessing health and social care services in Ireland, and provides examples of how access can be improved from the published international literature. The authors stress that heteronormativity and discrimination must be addressed across the whole health system to achieve the health policy goal of supporting all older adults to enjoy health and well-being. Four articles have a specific focus looking at care for transgender (TG) individuals. In an Irish study, the lack of information and non-affirmative experiences of TG people are contributing to poor clinician–patient relationships and impacting attrition. A Canadian study highlights the integral role of nurses in primary care for TG people. Findings encourage opportunities for mentorship and collaboration to aid nurses to develop their capacity to care for this vulnerable population. Ensuring that the health care organisation is a safe space will allow TG people to access inclusive and gender-affirming health care services. A systematic review examining the experiences and support needs of homeless transgender people identified that due to the complex and multifaceted needs of this group, coordinated and effective collaborations need to be in place. The implications for nurse managers of the studies included in this issue are clear. From the studies in this special issue, we gain new insight because the results underline the relevance of these factors across the world, in many differently organised health care systems. It is clear across all settings, however, that nurses must have a fundamental understanding of the unique needs of LGBTQ+ people and be prepared to practise cultural competence when caring for these individuals. Clinical nurses are frequently the first point of contact with health services, and they are in a prime position to respond to the needs of LGBTQ+ individuals. Besides structural-level changes, nurse managers should also consider ongoing mentoring for experienced nurses who might have limited information about this populations' health needs in order to be equipped enough to provide a high-quality and culturally competent care. The papers in this special issue have described the many opportunities for nurse managers to become leaders in the standards of care provided for LGBT+ individuals and to ensure that this care is provided in an open, inclusive and non-discriminatory manner. By creating an atmosphere that promotes inclusivity, nurse managers can ensure better outcomes for both patients and nurses. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Ethical approval was not required for this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing ManagementSame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207