MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111164681 · doi:10.26494/wonderer69158

Gender Disassociation and Identity Displacement as an Effect of Victorian Depictions of Disability: John Halifax, Gentleman and ‘The Withered Arm’

2020· article· en· W3111164681 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jasmine Rothon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingIdentity (music)PsychoanalysisPsychologyArtArt historyHistoryAestheticsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In John Halifax, Gentleman (1856), Phineas Fletcher, feeling uncharacteristically strong and healthy, tells us that 'for that one night, at least, I felt myself a man'. 1 By telling us that only when he is unusually strong can Phineas feel truly masculine, the author, Dinah Mulock Craik, implies that, in his lifelong, inescapable infirmity, he is not ordinarily masculine enough to be considered a man.In 'The Withered Arm' (1888), Thomas Hardy plays with concepts of beauty in relation to disfigurement, presenting a disabled woman who feels unable to identify with her femininity.In these two texts, Craik and Hardy toy with concepts of gender, and associating with common tropes of one's gender, highlighting that gender expression and feelings of gender identity relate heavily to one's physicality.As a man enfeebled by his illness, Craik's Phineas Fletcher is consistently feminised and aligned with female characters.Conversely, Hardy's Gertrude Lodge, once considered delicately feminine, feels exhaustingly unable to perform her feminine duties as a wife due to her untreatable physical disfigurement, as she is 1 Dinah Mulock Craik, John Halifax, Gentleman (London: Readers Library Publishing Co.Ltd., 1856), p. 60.Further references to this edition are given after quotations in the text.pulled further and further from any form of gender identity.Through the acute feminisation of Phineas, and Gertrude's disassociation with her once 'evanescent' femininity, it is clear that Victorian writers assign disability a sense of gender in a disparaging way, creating a sense of disassociation of gender and identity displacement for disabled characters. 2 Throughout my exploration of the two texts, I will be analysing their presentation of gender disassociation.For the purposes of the essay, this term means how characters fail to identify to their gender in typical ways, and how they express concepts of androgynous or cross-gender identity.In Craik's John Halifax, Gentleman, disability is depicted as unmanly.Whether this is through depicting Phineas as child-like or feminised, he is rarely presented as an adult man, especially in comparison to the perfect masculinity of John Halifax.Phineas' disability comes in the form of extreme physical weakness and constant fatigue, leaving him unable to walk, either without support or at all at varying points of the novel.Partially, the feminisation of Phineas comes from the fact that he is housebound.Phineas is unable to work and is therefore bound to the domestic sphere of the home.This aligns Phineas more with Ursula than John Halifax, ultimately feminising him.Given that this novel endorses separate spheres for men and women, as seen through the constant naming of Ursula as simply 'the mother' following her marriage to John, it is especially pertinent that Phineas is housebound.Craik makes a distinct decision to show women in the home, and men in the workplace, so in keeping Phineas in the feminine sphere, she feminises the disabled character.Interestingly, Rosemarie Garland Thomson tells us that femininity and disability are often equated in literature, as they 'are cast as deviant and inferior; both are excluded from full participation in public as well as economic life'.3 We can see how Craik's characterisation of Phineas is aligned with a tradition of writing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0340.032
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0020.015
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207