MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111204948 · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78907-w

Genome-wide association identifies several QTLs controlling cysteine and methionine content in soybean seed including some promising candidate genes

2020· article· en· W3111204948 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sidiki Malle, Milad Eskandari, Malcolm J. Morrison, François Belzile

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of GuelphUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethionineBiologyQuantitative trait locusGeneCandidate geneGeneticsAmino acidSingle-nucleotide polymorphismPhenotypeLocus (genetics)Genotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soybean is an important source of protein, oil and carbohydrates, as well as other beneficial nutrients. A major function of proteins in nutrition is to supply adequate amounts of amino acids. Although they are essential for human nutrition, the sulfur-containing amino acids cysteine (Cys) and methionine (Met) are often limited and the genetic control of their content in soybean seeds is poorly characterized. This study aimed to characterize the phenotypic variation and identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with Cys and Met content in a core set of 137 soybean lines, representative of the genetic diversity among Canadian short-season soybean, spanning maturity groups 000-II (MG000-II). Significant phenotypic differences were found among these lines for Cys, Met and Cys + Met content. Using both a mixed linear model and six multi-locus methods with a catalogue of 2.18 M SNPs, we report a total of nine QTLs and seventeen QTNs of which seven comprise promising candidate genes. This work allowed us to reproducibly detect multiple novel loci associated with sulfur-containing amino acid content. The markers and genes identified in this study may be useful for soybean genetic improvement aiming to increase Cys and Met content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207