MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Concept of Irq al-nasa (sciatica) and its management in Unani system of medicine

2020· article· en· W3111213362 on OpenAlexaff
Shahid Suhail, S Shakir Jamil, Shama Khan, Shazia Jilani, Shabnam Ansari

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Unani and Integrative Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamilies in Therapy and Culture
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSciaticaMedicineSciatic nerveLow back painSurgeryPhysical therapyAnesthesiaAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sciatica is considered a type of neuropathic pain and is one of the commonest variations of low back pain (LBP). It is a subgroup of Low Back Pain, involving nerve root compression, and this condition has a life time prevalence of 4-5%. In Unani system of medicine, sciatica is known as Irq al-Nasa and Rengan. Unani scholars defined Irq al-Nasa (sciatica) in details and throw light about its probable patho-physiology, symptoms management and treatment as described in ancient book. In this review paper, an attempt has been made to explore the understanding of Irq al-Nasa (sciatica) in the light of Unani literature. Various kind of drug, non-drug Ilaj bil-tadbeer (regimenal therapy) practised for the management of Irq al-Nasa (sciatica) are discussed in full length paper. Also, there is brief review of patho-physiology, clinical a presentation and principal of treatment are focused in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Unani and Integrative MedicineSame topicFamilies in Therapy and CultureFrench-language works237,207