MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111237371 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.200

EPID-14. GABRIELLA MILLER KIDS FIRST DATA RESOURCE CENTER: COLLABORATIVE PLATFORMS FOR ACCELERATING RESEARCH IN PEDIATRIC CANCERS & STRUCTURAL BIRTH DEFECTS

2020· article· en· W3111237371 on OpenAlexaff
Allison P. Heath, Yuankun Zhu, Michele Mattioni, Bailey Farrow, Jena Lilly, Yiran Guo, Jo Lynne Rokita, Phillip B. Storm, Samuel L. Volchenboum, Javad Nazarian, Nicole Vasilevsky, Jack DiGiovanna, Melissa Haendel, Robert L. Grossman, Brandi N. Davis‐Dusenbery, Deanne Taylor, Vincent Ferretti, Adam Resnick

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineInstitute of Cancer ResearchOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteroperabilityComputer scienceWorkflowCloud computingDownloadData scienceResource (disambiguation)World Wide WebDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Since launching to the public in September 2018, the Gabriella Miller Kids First Data Resource Center (DRC) has made an increasing number of pediatric genomic studies available to the research community. Currently, 1.3 PBs of genomic and clinical data drawn from 12,000 participants are available across a variety of pediatric cancer and structural birth defect studies. The DRC has architected a secure, cloud-based platform with over 1,300 users that supports the ability of researchers to not only find, access, and reuse data, but also integrate, collaborate, and analyze data quickly at scale. Users can use integrations with platforms such as Cavatica for bioinformatics workflows and PedcBioPortal for cancer genomic visualizations. Additionally, a set of framework services, powered by Gen3, provide a foundation for interoperability with other large-scale data sources, platforms, and a growing ecosystem of analysis and visualization applications. These integrations allow users to search across both TARGET and Kids First clinical data in one location while allowing data governance to be maintained by the original approvers. The new “explore data” feature allows users to search across all studies in order to identify virtual cohorts. Within the portal, these cohorts can be saved and shared with collaborators for iterative refinement and analysis. With appropriate approvals, the associated genomic data can be accessed and analyzed seamlessly in Cavatica or other platforms with interoperable framework services. Additionally, gene searching capabilities will be available in 2020. Data is free to download and cloud credits are available for analysis support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1550.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.580
GPT teacher head0.563
Teacher spread0.017 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207