SA-YOLOv3: An Efficient and Accurate Object Detector Using Self-Attention Mechanism for Autonomous Driving
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Object detection is becoming increasingly significant for autonomous-driving system. However, poor accuracy or low inference performance limits current object detectors in applying to autonomous driving. In this work, a fast and accurate object detector termed as SA-YOLOv3, is proposed by introducing dilated convolution and self-attention module (SAM) into the architecture of YOLOv3. Furthermore, loss function based on GIoU and focal loss is reconstructed to further optimize detection performance. With an input size of$512\times 512$, our proposed SA-YOLOv3 improves YOLOv3 by 2.58 mAP and 2.63 mAP on KITTI and BDD100K benchmarks, with real-time inference (more than 40 FPS). When compared with other state-of-the-art detectors, it reports better trade-off in terms of detection accuracy and speed, indicating the suitability for autonomous-driving application. To our best knowledge, it is the first method that incorporates YOLOv3 with attention mechanism, and we expect this work would guide for autonomous-driving research in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".