MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111257103 · doi:10.24843/ach.2018.v05.i02.p04

TINGKAT PENGETAHUAN, SIKAP, DAN KEINGINAN SUAMI DARI PASANGAN USIA SUBUR TERHADAP METODE KONTRASEPSI VASEKTOMI DI KECAMATAN DENPASAR SELATAN TAHUN 2017

2018· article· id· W3111257103 on OpenAlexaff
Kadek Diah Wulandari, Ketut Hari Mulyawan, Desak Nyoman Widyanthini

Bibliographic record

VenueARCHIVE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMale Reproductive Health Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRAK Kota Denpasar merupakan salah satu daerah yang memiliki akseptor Keluarga Berencana (KB) pria (vasektomi) terendah di Provinsi Bali dengan akseptor rate tahun 2015 sebesar 0,0013. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengetahuan, sikap dan keinginan suami dari pasangan usia subur (PUS) terhadap metode kontrasepsi vasektomi di Kecamatan Denpasar Selatan Tahun 2017. Penelitian ini merupakan cross sectional deskriptif yang dilakukan pada suami dari pasangan usia subur (PUS) di wilayah Kecamatan Denpasar Selatan tahun 2017 sebanyak 62 sampel yang memenuhi kriteria menjadi akseptor vasektomi, yang dipilih secara multistage random sampling dari 326 pasangan usia subur (PUS) yang berdomisili di 10 desa/kelurahan di Kecamatan Denpasar Selatan. Data pengetahuan, sikap dan keinginan menggunakan metode wawancara dan dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sebanyak 9,7% suami dari pasangan usia subur (PUS) berkeinginan menjadi akseptor vasektomi, sebanyak 66,1% memiliki pengetahuan kurang dan sebanyak 72,6% memiliki sikap positif terhadap kontrasepsi vasektomi. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa lebih dari setengah responden memiliki pengetahuan yang rendah dan tidak berkeinginan terhadap metode kontrasepsi vasektomi Diharapkan kepada petugas kesehatan khususnya BKKBN dapat memberikan sasaran penyuluhan yang lebih mengkhusus kepada masyarakat dengan kelompok umur 35-45 tahun dan diharapkan dapat memberikan informasi sedini mungkin tentang kontrasepsi vasektomi bagi pasangan suami istri. Kata Kunci: Pengetahuan, Sikap, Keinginan, Metode Kontrasepsi Vasektomi, Suami dari Pasangan Usia Subur (PUS) ABSTRACT Denpasar City is one of the regions that has the lowest male family planning (KB) acceptor (vasectomy) in Bali with an acceptor rate of 0.0013 in 2015. The purpose of this study was to determine the knowledge, attitudes and desires of husbands of fertile age couples (PUS) to vasectomy contraceptive methods in the South Denpasar District in 2017. This study use a descriptive cross sectional study conducted on husbands of fertile age couples (PUS) in the District area South Denpasar in 2017 as many as 62 samples that met the criteria of being a vasectomy acceptor, were selected by multistage random sampling from 326 fertile age couples (PUS) who are domiciled in 10 villages / sub-districts in South Denpasar District. Knowledge data, attitudes and desires using the interview method and analyzed descriptively. The results showed 9.7% of husbands of fertile age couples (PUS) wanted to be vasectomy acceptors, 66.1% had less knowledge and 72.6% had positive attitudes towards vasectomy contraception. From this study it can be concluded that more than half of respondents have low knowledge and do not wish to have vasectomy contraception methods. It is expected that health workers, especially BKKBN, can provide counseling targets that are more specific to people in the age group of 35-45 years and are expected to provide information as early as possible about vasectomy contraception for married couples. Keywords: Knowledge, Attitude, Desire, Vasectomy Contraception Method, Husband of a Fertile Age Partner (PUS)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCHIVE OF COMMUNITY HEALTHSame topicMale Reproductive Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207