Effect of secondary filler properties and geometry on the electrical, dielectric, and electromagnetic interference shielding properties of carbon nanotubes/polyvinylidene fluoride nanocomposites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hybrid polymer nanocomposites based on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) as the matrix, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as the primary conductive filler, and metal nanoparticles as secondary fillers were fabricated by melt mixing. Secondary nanofillers with different geometry and properties (nickel nanowire (NiNW), silver nanowire (AgNW), nickel nanoparticle (NiNP), and silver nanoparticle (AgNP) were selected to investigate the effect of geometry and properties of secondary filler on the hybrid polymer nanocomposites' properties. Electrical conductivity, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness, and complex microwave properties of the fabricated hybrid nanocomposites were studied in X‐band frequency (8.2–12.4 GHz). The hybrid nanocomposites containing CNT/AgNW demonstrated superior conductivity and EMI shielding compared to individual fillers such as CNT, AgNW, NiNW, AgNP, NiNP, or hybrid system such as CNT/NiNW. The novelty of the present study lies in the unique synergy arising from the combination of nanofillers with similar geometry and high electrical conductivity, which resulted EMI shielding effectiveness as high as 27 dB for a shield with only 1.1 mm thickness. The EMI shielding mechanisms, including negative permittivity were studied and explained in details in the manuscript.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it