MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111321844 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2018-0474

Dynamic characteristics of Canada's Parliament Hill towers from ambient vibrations and recorded earthquake data

2020· article· en· W3111321844 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Michal Kolaj, J Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsTowerAmbient vibrationParliamentSeismologyBlock (permutation group theory)VibrationGeologyStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsLawGeometryFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamic properties of Parliament Hill’s buildings (Ottawa, Canada) are of particular interest due to their important heritage value and because of the seismic retrofit project currently underway. To measure the dynamic properties directly, ambient vibration data were collected within the Peace Tower of Centre Block and the South-West Tower of East Block and processed together with weak to strong ground motions from six earthquakes. Both datasets found the fundamental mode to be 1.0–1.15 Hz for the Peace Tower and 2 Hz for the South-West Tower. The 2010 magnitude 5 Val-des-Bois earthquake induced peak accelerations of 49% g and 18% g in the top floors of the Peace and South-West towers, respectively, triggering a nonlinear response, causing the frequencies of the dominant modes to be reduced by 10%–15%. The reduction in frequency was temporary and the frequencies returned to baseline values, suggesting that there was no permanent structural damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207