Optimisation de l'utilisation du <i>Panicum maximum</i> C1 <i>Aeschynomene histrix, Stylosanthès hamata</i> et,<i> Arachis pintoï</i> sur les performances zootechniques des lapins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Burkina Faso l’alimentation des animaux pendant la saison sèche constitue le premier contraint du développement de l’élevage. Cette étude a pour but d’évaluer l’effet d’une alimentation à base de Panicum maximum C1, Aeschynomene histrix, Stylosanthès hamata, Arachis pintoï sur les performances zootechniques des lapins. Le dispositif expérimental a été réalisé sur la Station de Recherche de Farako-Bâ. Au total, neuf (9) lapins mâles (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) âgés de dix (10) semaines et pesant en moyenne (790 ± 39,04g) chacun, ont été répartis dans 3 cages de volume: 42 cm x 63 cm x 39 cm soit un volume de 103194 cm3 chacune. Ces lapins ont été répartis en trois (3) lots de trois (3) lapins chacun. Les lots ont reçu les rations suivantes: la ration1du lot1(R1L1) était composée de l’aliment Panicum maximum C1, Aeschynomene histrix ; la ration 2 (R2L2), Panicum maximum C1, Stylosanthès hamata et la ration 3 (R3L3), Panicum maximum C1, Arachis pintoï. A chaque ration on a ajouté du son de maïs et de riz et du sel. Les lapins nourris à la ration R3L3, ont eu un gain moyen journalier de 9,13±4,33 g/j contre 8,51±2,22g/j pour R1L1 8,90±3,33g/j pour R2L2. Une différence non significative (p > 0,05) est observée entre les trois rations. La ration R3L3 donne de bonnes performances zootechniques et constitue un atout économique pour les cunicultures.Mots clés : lapins, rations, gain moyen quotidien, alimentation English title: Optimization of the use of Panicum maximum C1 and Aeschynomene histrix, Stylosanthes hamata and, Arachis pintoï on the zootechnical performance of rabbitsIn Burkina Faso feeding animals during the dry season is the main constraint on livestock development. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a diet based on Panicum maximum C1, Aeschynomene histrix, Stylosanthès hamata, and Arachis pintoï on the zootechnical performance of rabbits. The experimental device was carried out at the Farako-Bâ Research Station. A total of nine (9) male rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) aged ten (10) weeks and weighing on average (790 ±39,04g) each, were distributed in three volume cages: 42 cm x 63 cm x 39 cm, each having a volume of 103194 cm3. These rabbits were divided into three (3) lots of three (3) rabbits each. The lots received the following rations: ration1 of Lot 1(R1L1) consisted of the food Panicum maximum C1 and Aeschynomene histrix; ration 2 (R2L2), Panicum maximum C1 and Stylosanthès hamata and ration 3 (R3L3), Panicum maximum C1, Arachis pintoï. Corn and rice bran and salt was added to each ration. Rabbits fed R3L3, had an average daily gain of 9,13±4,33 g/d compared to 8,51±2,22g/d for R1L1 and 8,90±3,33g/d for R2L2. There was no difference between the three rations (p > 0.05) but the R3L3 ration provides good zootechnical performance and is an economic asset for cuniculture.Keywords: Rabbits, rations, average daily gain, feed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".