A Decentralized Electricity Trading Framework (DETF) for Connected EVs: A Blockchain and Machine Learning for Profit Margin Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Connected electric vehicles (CEVs) can help cities to reduce road congestion and increase road safety. With the technical improvement made to the battery system in terms of capacity and flexibility, CEVs, as mobile power plants can be an important actor for the electricity markets. Especially, they can trade electricity between each other when supply stations are full or temporarily not available. In this article, we propose an advanced decentralized electricity trading framework between CEVs in parking lots based on consortium blockchain, machine learning, and Game theoretic model. We design a distributed smart contract solution based on a stochastic bidding process, which helps CEVs to sell and buy electricity with their maximum profitability. Finally, numerical simulations with MATLAB and Solidity are conducted to prove the effectiveness of our proposed solution. Also, a comparison with another method in terms of CEVs' profitability improvement and energy trading management is provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it