MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111411901 · doi:10.3934/math.2021109

Derivation of some integrals in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik

2020· article· en· W3111411901 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Reynolds, A D Stauffer

Bibliographic record

VenueAIMS Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Identities
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)Function (biology)CombinatoricsMathematicsMathematical physicsPhysicsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we present derivations of the formula listed in entry 4.113 in the sixth edition of Gradshteyn and Rhyzik's table of integrals. We evaluate two definite integrals of the form $ \begin{equation*} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{e^{-iay}(-iy+\log(z))^k+e^{iay}(iy+\log(z))^k}{\cosh(by)}dy \end{equation*} $ and $ \begin{equation*} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{e^{iay}(iy+\log(z))^k-e^{-iay}(-iy+\log(z))^k}{\sinh(b y)}dy \end{equation*} $ in terms of the Lerch function where $ k $, $ a $, $ z $ and $ b $ are arbitrary complex numbers. The entries in the table(s) are obtained as special cases in the paper below.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIMS MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Mathematical IdentitiesFrench-language works237,207