Forecasting Individual Aging Trajectories and Survival with an Interpretable Network Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We have built a computational model of individual aging trajectories of health and survival, containing physical, functional, and biological variables, conditioned on demographic, lifestyle, and medical background information. We combine techniques of modern machine learning with a network approach, where the health variables are coupled by an interaction network within a stochastic dynamical system. The resulting model is scalable to large longitudinal data sets, is predictive of individual high-dimensional health trajectories and survival, and infers an interpretable network of interactions between the health variables. The interaction network gives us the ability to identify which interactions between variables are used by the model, demonstrating that realistic physiological connections are inferred. We use English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA) data to train our model and show that it performs better than standard linear models for health outcomes and survival, while also revealing the relevant interactions. Our model can be used to generate synthetic individuals that age realistically from input data at baseline, as well as the ability to probe future aging outcomes given an arbitrary initial health state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".