MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111450097 · doi:10.14740/jcgo.v9i4.668

Thrombolysis After Emergency Cesarean Section in Sickle Cell Disease

2020· article· en· W3111450097 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Seema Nahid, S. Röhrig, Santhosh Gopalakrishnan, Elmutwakil Billah Gubara, Marcus D. Lancé

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisPulmonary embolismComplicationAcute chest syndromePregnancySurgerySickle cell traitDiseasePediatricsAnesthesiaMyocardial infarctionInternal medicineSickle cell anemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a rare complication during pregnancy. However, it is still the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The risk to develop a PE is even higher in patients suffering from an inherited blood disorder like sickle cell disease (SCD). We report on the management of a 28-year-old woman with SCD who was admitted to the hospital with painful sickle cell crisis and developed a massive PE followed by cardiac arrest. The patient could be revived and underwent thrombolysis successfully with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) 22 h after emergency cesarean section without complications related to thrombolysis. However, she developed an acute kidney injury and transient liver dysfunction which both improved gradually during her course. Finally, she was extubated on the 16th postoperative day and transferred to the obstetric ward on the 21st postoperative day. The patient recovered completely and was discharged home without neurological deficit. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2020;9(4):124-128 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo668

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207